论我国民事审前程序

论文编号:SS022  包括:开题报告,中英文摘要,论文,目录,文献综述,任务书,答辩,中期检查表,等    论文字数:9577,页数:19

摘    要
随着法治发展和诉讼高潮的到来，民事诉讼审前程序成了当前审判方式改革的一个热门话题,因为它的合理与否直接影响着民事审判的公正与效率。重新审视构建审前准备程序有利于案件集中审理，提高效益，保障公平、公正，实现正义。本文首先对审前程序的基本原理进行概述，然后对比两大法系的优劣，接着分分析我国目前在立法和司法实践的众多弊端和症结，最后借鉴吸收西方国家的经验和成功做法，结合我国的现有国情研究得出改革中坚持的原则和相关的制度构建和改革完善的措施，以期早日建成程意义上的审前程序。

关键词：民事诉讼   审前程序   正义效率  制度构建
 

Discussions on the pre-trail procedures of china
Abstract
With the development of the rule of law and the upsurge of the litigation, the pre-trial procedures for civil trial is becoming a hot topic in the current reform of the trial mode, because the construction of the proceedings is reasonable or not which directly affect the justice and efficiency  on the trial of civil. re-positioning the function of the pre-trial preparation program features which will has a positive significance to deepen the judicial reform and improves the Civil litigation Law , protects the fairness ,realizes the justice value target. This article outlines the basic principles of principles of the pre-trial procedures and contrasts the two law systems. Then it analyzes the drawbacks in the current legislation and judicial practice. In the end it absorbs the experience of Western countries and successful practices of the current situation in the reform, studies the principles and relevant constructional steps, and improves the measures of system .in the end the author want to construct the real pre-trial procedures.

Key words: civil procedure, pre-trail procedures, justice, Construction of the system

目    录
摘要 ............................................................Ⅱ
Abstract .........................................................Ⅲ
前言 ............................................................1
一、民事审前程序的概述 ..........................................2
（一）民事审前程序的概念和特征 ..................................2
（二）民理审前程序的功能............................... .........2
二、民事审前程序的比较研究...................................... 4
（一）美国的审前程序 ........................................... 4
(二) 德国的民事审前程序  ........................................5
（三）英美法系和大陆法系审前程序的比较  .........................6
三、我国民事审前程序立法现状与不足.............................. 8
四、我国民事审前程序的司法实践和存在的问题  .....................10
五、我国民事审前程序改革应适用的原则 ............................12
(一)当事人处分权为主导与法官监督相结合的原则 ....................12
（二）效率、效益的原则 ..........................................12
（三）辩论原则.................................................. 12
（四）借鉴、吸收、适应国情的原则 ................................12
六、对我国民事审前程序规则体系设计之构想........................ 14
（一）设立专门完成审前程序的组织机构和法官 ......................14
（二）建立有效的答辩制度.....................................14                              
（三）健全法官的释明权......................................... .14
（四）建立证据开示制度和相应程序 ................................15
（五）替代性纠纷解决方式（ＡＤＲ）在审前程序中的运用 ............15
结论 ...........................................................17
参考文献........................................................ 18
致谢 ...........................................................19

相关论文