美中贸易全国委员会对中华人民共和国雇佣合约法律草案的评论

中文字数: 3809  ,中文页数:  4   英文字数:  2143  ,字符数:11778  ,页数:7

美中贸易全国委员会对中华人民共和国雇佣合约法律草案的评论
（2006，12，24草案）

美中贸易全国委员会（USCBC）完全赞成一个合理公平的雇佣合约法，并且非常珍惜他们能够为雇佣合约法律草案（2006，12，24草案）的修改提出建议和意见的机会。我们坚信这次评论的机会正说明了中华人共和国政府对增强制定法律政策时公开性和透明度而作的努力。
   USCBC表示，美国250个公司都在积极的从事经商全国所有行业部门。我们相信我们在中国的公司成员在过去的20年里都在为雇佣关系的政策及其落实作出积极的贡献。这些经历为我们定制这些法律草案的评论时都具有积极的参考价值。同时我们希望这些评论是具有建设性的和富有成效的。
目前已经被接受的法律草案对先前的草案的改进以及加强对雇佣者和被雇佣者的保护作用显得至关重要。我们诚恳地指出若干条文可能是受益于进一步归类或修改，以确保利益和义务双方都得到平衡。

试用期
 1995年的劳动法第21条显示，中华人民共和国法律制定者发现，对于雇佣者和劳动者来说，一个适当长度的试用期来评估劳动关系之间的合理性是至关重要的。在现在的法律草案中还是要做适当的规定来限制试用期间法律草案的使用，可能会使雇主在招聘和雇佣新雇员时更加的谨慎。

THE  US-CHINA  BUSINESS  COUNCIL
US China Business Council
Comments on the Draft People’s Republic of China Law on Employment
Contracts (Draft of December 24, 2006)

The US-China Business Council (USCBC) fully supports a reasonable and balanced Employment Contract Law and appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the revised draft Employment Contract Law of December 24, 2006 (“Draft Law”). We believe this opportunity to comment illustrates the PRC government’s effort to provide more openness and transparency in the formulation of policy and legislation.
USCBC represents 250 US companies that are actively engaged in doing business across all industry sectors.We believe our member companies operating in China have contributed positively to the development of
employment policies and practices over the past two decades. This experience has been very helpful as we formulated these comments on the Draft Law. We hope these comments will prove constructive and useful.
    The revised Draft Law makes significant improvements to the previous draft and strengthens protections for both employees and employers. We respectfully submit that a few provisions may benefit from further
clarification or revision to ensure that the interests and obligations of all parties are adequately balanced.

PROBATIONARY PERIODS
    Article 21 of the existing 1995 Labor Law demonstrates that PRC lawmakers recognize the importance of having a probationary period of suitable length for both employee and employer to evaluate fully the suitability of the work relationship. Certain provisions in the current Draft Law will restrict the utility of the probationary
period, and possibly make employers more cautious in recruiting and hiring new employees.

相关论文